Michigan court rules Trump's election lawsuit unlikely to succeed on merits

The Michigan Court of Claims ruled against the Trump campaign in its lawsuit requesting the state stop counting ballots. It sued the Secretary of State on Wednesday asking for the count to stop until they could get “meaningful” access to the canvassing.

The Attorney General’s office released the following statement:

“We are pleased with Court of Claims Judge Cynthia Stephens' swift action in today’s hearing on Trump v Benson to deny the relief requested by plaintiffs. She identified the same defects in the campaign's filings as we did, namely a complete lack of any evidence of wrongdoing on the part of election officials, and meritless legal arguments. Michigan’s elections have been fair, transparent and reflect the will of the voters, and we will continue to defend against any challenges that claim otherwise.”

Trump campaign manager Bill Stepien released the following statement on Wednesday.

"As votes in Michigan continue to be counted, the presidential race in the state remains extremely tight as we always knew it would be. President Trump’s campaign has not been provided with meaningful access to numerous counting locations to observe the opening of ballots and the counting process, as guaranteed by Michigan law. We have filed suit today in the Michigan Court of Claims to halt counting until meaningful access has been granted. We also demand to review those ballots which were opened and counted while we did not have meaningful access. President Trump is committed to ensuring that all legal votes are counted in Michigan and everywhere else."

Share this article:
 
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?
Close
Are you sure you want to delete this comment?